MSRA overview and arrangements
Current examination arrangements, specialties using the MSRA, testing information and candidate requirements.
Open the official MSRA overview →Official exam information, authoritative UK clinical guidance, professional standards and practical revision tools—organised around the two MSRA papers.
Start here
Use these sources first to understand the current assessment, question formats and expected standard.
Current examination arrangements, specialties using the MSRA, testing information and candidate requirements.
Open the official MSRA overview →Official Clinical Problem Solving and Professional Dilemmas examples, answer keys, glossary and explanations.
Open the official practice paper →Target competencies, item formats, F2 context and the official explanation of how responses are scored.
Read the PD specification →Important: Recruitment rules and testing arrangements can change between application rounds. Always confirm the latest information on the NHS England Medical Hub and your chosen specialty’s recruitment page.
Paper one
Prioritise commonly encountered UK presentations, safe initial management, investigations, prescribing, prevention and escalation.
Evidence-based guidance for diagnosis, investigation, first-line management, referral and safety-netting.
Browse NICE conditions and diseases →Structured acute-medicine pathways supporting clinical reasoning, assessment, immediate management and escalation across common acute presentations. Use alongside current national and local guidance.
Explore Acute Medical Take →Indications, contraindications, interactions, cautions, monitoring, adverse effects and prescribing in adults and children.
Open the BNF →UK vaccination schedules, contraindications, special groups and management of vaccine-preventable disease.
Open the Green Book →Current adult, paediatric and newborn resuscitation guidance, including special circumstances and emergency care.
Open the 2025 guidelines →Revise screening programmes, health promotion, contraception, safeguarding and common public-health decisions.
Review NHS screening information →A current concise clinical handbook can support background revision, but current UK guidance should take precedence where recommendations differ.
See the high-yield topic map →Clinical topic map
Build breadth first, then use question performance to target weak systems and recurring decision errors.
Paper two
Approach scenarios from the perspective of an F2 doctor: protect patients, work within competence, communicate respectfully, escalate proportionately and take responsibility.
The core source for safe care, partnership with patients, collaboration, workplace culture, integrity and professionalism.
Read Good medical practice →Review confidentiality, consent, raising concerns, duty of candour, professional boundaries and conflicts of interest.
Browse GMC professional standards →Professional capabilities and expected behaviours relevant to the F2 role used in Professional Dilemmas scenarios.
Open the UKFP syllabus →Rank four or five independent actions from most to least appropriate. Judge each action on its own merits rather than treating the list as a chronological plan.
Select the three actions that, taken together, most appropriately address the situation. The official paper uses plausible options rather than obviously absurd distractors.
Exam technique: There is no negative marking in the Professional Dilemmas paper, so attempt every question.
Use resources effectively
Reading alone is not enough. Combine guidance with deliberate question practice and structured review.
Read the official specification and complete the official practice questions before relying on third-party banks.
Work across clinical systems and alternate Clinical Problem Solving with Professional Dilemmas.
Identify why the correct answer is best and why each alternative is unsafe, incomplete or lower priority.
Track accuracy and timing, revisit weak topics and complete timed mixed mock examinations.
AMT MSRA
AMT MSRA combines clinically reviewed questions with concise explanations, incorrect-alternative rationales, guideline references and performance analysis.